And what in the name of all that’s sane is this Azalea doing bursting into bloom on my patio? I guess it was lulled into a sense of false security. Well, it must be pretty fed-up now.
Let’s be fair, not all’s gloom and doom. Jackie and I had a very successful book signing session at Waterstones in Dorking last week – delightful staff and friendly customers, including a number of regulars who come in once a month to stock up on new books. Very pleased to say some of them stocked up on ours. This store is very proactive and deserves to succeed.
I note, on the other hand that Borders are in serious trouble and, failing a saviour, are about to close. I always thought highly of Borders until last year when I responded to their online invitation to submit books to their buying department for consideration. I sent them a copy of Darshan, only to receive a snooty note some time later saying they weren’t considering new books at the moment due to some feeble excuse – stock-taking, I think it was - and if I wanted my book back I’d have to send them postage. All I can say is that if a major company like that can’t even keep its website up to date, no wonder it can’t run its company successfully.
And while I’m having a moan, although I’m pleased that my Amazon rating for both The Moon’s Complexion and Darshan shot up last week and they appear to have sold out of both novels. Why, oh why, can’t they stock up again a bit more quickly? Not sure if this is their fault or the suppliers, but so shortly before Christmas is not the time when I want to see ‘temporarily out of stock’ on my book pages. At least they’re both available to online buyers from Waterstones and - yes- Borders online stores as well as a dozen others.
Books aside, I seem to be back and forth to the Great Metropolis a lot lately. On Monday Jennifer and I headed up to Victoria to hand in our passports to the Indian Visa Office.
Afterwards I went on to the Anish Kapoor exhibition at the Royal Academy. I am not a great follower of modern art – especially by people who have won the Turner Prize – as soon as I hear that warning bells start dinging. But I’ve enjoyed some Kapoor that I’ve seen previously – his mirror work in particular – here’s the one in front of the Monte Carlo casino.

And these are of the one in the courtyard of the RA (Burlington House).
I’m thankful that as a Friend of the RA I didn’t have to pay the wopping £12 entry fee. But I DID have to pay £2.50 for a flimsy 4-paged leaflet without which I would have been somewhat at a loss as there were no explanations anywhere. A rip-off if ever there was one.
The exhibition confirmed my opinion that Kapoor has a good sense of humour. I loved the bulges in the walls, and the ‘self-manifested’ objects bursting from floors and walls (a very Indian concept). The mirrors were fun – art? Who knows? I suppose as much as funny fairground mirrors are art.
The computer-generated worm-casts (which is what Joe and I decided they were) were also fun, especially the one that looked like a curled up hedgehog. Art? Maybe. But not in my backyard peleeeeease!
What can I say about the red wax extravaganzas? Words fail me. The doorway-sized block of wax travelling on rails between 4 of the RA galleries was entitled Svayambh, Sanskrit for ‘self-generated’. Mm. I think it should have been called ‘Giant red loaf of bread.’
As for the cannon that shoots blobs of wax through (a different) doorway at the RA walls every 20 minutes, with a great rushing swoosh and ear-shattering explosion - well… it’s a crowd pleaser and we all left chuckling, giggling or laughing hysterically.
BUT IS IT ART????????????????? I know what I think.
This is turning into a very long blog. I suppose it makes up for the fact that my contributions are so sporadic.
Yesterday Joe and I spent another day in London. First we headed off to the Maharaja exhibition at the V & A. This is also expensive - £11 full price, £9 seniors. But at least the accompanying leaflet is free.
I enjoyed the tour through the maharajas’ kingdoms, especially the full-sized model elephant and horse! But it wasn’t anything like as stunning and informative as this summer’s British Museum's Garden and Cosmos exhibition. Moreover I felt there were a lot of omissions. Chief among these was almost no mention of the Nizams of Hyderabad who surely (and I think William Dalrymple would back me on this) constituted one of the the most important Islamic dynasties of India. The Maharaja of Thanjavur was also given short shrift, as was the controversial Maharaja of Kashmir. One of the current Thanjavur Maharaja’s brothers actually runs the little shop on the site of the old ruined palace – sic transit Gloria.
After another quick look into the Anish Kapoor exhibition we had a late lunch/early dinner at Woodlands, pigging out on delicious South Indian fare that got me counting the days until coming trip to Bangalore.
Then off to the English National Opera for a double bill of Bartok’s opera -Duke Bluebeard’s Castle, and Stravinsky’s ballet -The Rite of Spring.
WELL… once more words fail me. I thought the Royal Opera was more experimental that the ENO. Wrong. Bluebeard – you know the story. He brings his bride Judith to his dark, damp castle and she gets him to open seven locked doors, each revealing something disturbing until finally the last door reveals his 3 previous wives in a state of living death, to be joined by Judith. It’s a psychodrama in extremis. The doors are usually understood to be doors to secret parts of Bluebeard's soul, which Judith coerces him to reveal, resulting in his ultimate absolute loneliness. I’ve seen several thought-provoking productions. The ENO production was – different.
Of course, not (to put it mildly) being a fan of ‘The Sound of Music’ the interpretation was lost on me until I read this review on the intermezzo.typepad.com blogsite today.
‘Daniel Kramer’s very graphic Bluebeard won’t please purists, but it’s riveting theatre. The reason for (Bluebeard’s) quaint Austrian hunting jacket soon becomes obvious – Bluebeard is a Fritzl-like figure with a Sound of Music fixation and a secret family in the basement. His ultimate kick is to dress up as Captain von Trapp while doing something extremely nasty with a sword to his spreadeagled Julie Andrews, Judith. The grubby slasher movie set is atmospheric if not quite the castle of the soul Bartok had in mind, and its boxy shape helps the voices project over the enlarged orchestra. The dramatic pacing is fantastic – Kramer lets little clues slip here and there, but the ending is still a colossal, queasy shock.’
You can say that again. If you’re in the mood for a ‘colossal, queasy shock’, I thoroughly recommend this. Personally it left me feeling uneasy. As a woman I don’t appreciate women being displayed in this way for theatrical purposes. Conclusion: musically stunning but I know what men do to women without having to see it spreadeagled on stage for the gratuitous purpose of theatre. This indignity could only have been staged by a man.
As for the Rite of Spring: a primitive myth, involving the selection of a virgin , who dances herself to death. At least that is what Stravinsky intended when he wrote the ballet. This, roughly speaking, is what we got yesterday (from the same reviewer):
‘A pity Fabulous Beast’s dance element was so risible. If a weary parade of bog-trotter clichés didn’t diminish the timeless power of Stravinsky’s score enough, there were twenty todgers jiggling in the breeze to contend with as the male dancers disrobed en masse. To give the much-derided Calixto Bieito his due, he understands the effect of mass male nudity on stage is purely and always comedic. And I was left baffled by the ending, where the Chosen One (female) is surrounded by men in frocks. Men should take women's place? A nice bit of misogyny to go home with.’
But the music… ah, the music!







